Skip to main content

Federal court orders charges to be dismissed against Michael Flynn




By ALEX

After a litany of setbacks handed to the Trump Administration by the Supreme Court, some good news for has finally come. On Wednesday a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss a felony-false statement charge he gave during Robert Mueller's probe into Trump/Russian ties.

The decision was split 2-1 along ideological lines. The majority opinion written by Judge Neomi Rao - a Trump appointee- said that allowing the case to continue would intrude on the executive branch's prerogatives to control criminal prosecutions. She went further by saying that scheduling a hearing was improper under the circumstances because there was no reason to doubt the government's prosecution decisions during the case.

“Each of our three coequal branches should be encouraged to self-correct when it errs. If evidence comes to light calling into question the integrity or purpose of an underlying criminal investigation, the Executive Branch must have the authority to decide that further prosecution is not in the interest of justice,” the majority statement says.

Reporting from Politico points out that the decision leans heavily on "presumption of regularity," which means that prosecutorial decisions made by the executive branch are made in good faith.

If the decision is blocked by a new appeal than Flynn will be exonerated for his crime, despite pleading guilty to the charges twice.

This was something I had a feeling would happen, as noted in a previous article so it shouldn't come as too much of a surprise. What infuriates me more is that it's becoming more and more clear that the Trump administration is using its power to very clearly help political allies. 

Earlier this year we saw Roger Stone, one of Trump's longtime political advisers get a lighter sentence. It was a move that made four prosecutors handling the case resign from their posts at the DoJ. More recently, in a book published by former National Security Advisor John Bolton, we now know that Trump has planned to remove the Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney George Berman to possibly help out a foreign dictator (though this right now is unverified and going off of Bolton's word is slippery.)

I'm not really sure I would believe that this decision from the DoJ was made in good faith. Flynn lied to investigators - he was not forced to do so - and plead guilty twice to breaking the Logan Act, which makes it a crime for private citizens to communicate with a foreign government without the legal authority.

This saga isn't over yet though and we'll have to see what happens next. It's hard for me to imagine Democrats or other legal authorities will lie over and let this happen - of course I have been wrong before.

What do you think though?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statehood, the coronavirus and how the U.S. sets the standard for policing

With everything going on in the world, it's easy to lose track of the important issues going on in the world. For this edition of Articles that Make You Smarter, I wanted to share three articles that would give some perspective on three major issues in America. I hope you read and enjoy: Why statehood matters: The House of Representatives approved a bill that would recognize Washington D.C. as the 51st state of the country. While the Senate will more than likely shoot the bill down, here's an article by The Gaurdian that explains everything surrounding the bid for statehood:  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/25/washington-dc-statehood-bid-house The United States and Policing: What's going on in America with policing doesn't just happen in a bubble. Here's a great article by The New Republic about how our country sets the standard for policing across the world: https://newrepublic.com/article/158297/america-exports-police-violence-around-world A new surge...

Democrats introduce overhaul of police reform

Today house democrats introduced t he Justice in Policing Act, which would hold police departments across the nation more accountable for their actions by stripping away some of their protections. The legislation would also c reate a national database of excessive-force incidents and ban police chokeholds. The legislation would also  revise the federal criminal police misconduct statute to make it easier to prosecute officers who are knowingly involved in reckless misconduct and seek to provide greater transparency on police behavior according to the AP News. To put it bluntly, as much as I want this legislation to get make ground, it is a long shot pipe dream to get put into law. This is because the senate is majority Republican and will more than likely shoot it down or have it stripped or include poison pill amendments to it, despite Senator Lindsey Graham and Majority Senate Leader Mitch McConnell vowing to look at the issues.  What do you think? -Ale...

eBay executives charged with harassment of a couple that criticized the company

In today's media/blogoshpere, it's hard to believe that just one thing can take the cake as biggest WTF news bit of the day. I mean, people brave enough to keep up with what's going on could read an awesome story about Beyonce writing a letter urging officials to look into Breonne Taylor's death to President Trump actually saying that if there were fewer tests we'd see fewer COVID-19 cases in America if any. That's like saying if we just closed our eyes, we'd see fewer petitions to see the Zack Snyder cut of Justice League if any. It's still going to be there and we all have to accept that it's going to happen and adjust our lives accordingly. However, I think I found the WTF story of the day. Today, it was reported by Buzzfeed that six eBay executives targeted and allegedly terrorized a middle-aged couple because of extremely critical articles the two wrote for their newsletter.  The executives at the company sent the couple disturbing packages li...